November 10, 2012
Americans should quit complaining.

Which system would you prefer to live under?

This is the first time since 1992 that a CCP national party congress and an American Presidential election have occured in the same year. The contrast could not be more striking. Say what you will about the recent American Presidential election. Neither candidate generated widespread excitement, even among the respective party bases. The campaigns were overwhelmingly negative and voters felt besieged by an avalanche of mud-slinging super-pac ads in the wake of citizens united. But given the alternative, Americans should feel pretty damn good about their system. I know many Chinese, who are perplexed by the constant griping Americans emit during election season. As well they should be. Especially when they compare the American system to their own.

This week approximately twenty four men (and one woman) with matching dark blue suits, red ties and jet black, dyed hair will determine the seven to nine members of the politburo standing committee. This small group of oligarchs will rule a country of 1.3 billion people. By rising to the pinnacle of the Chinese system they will be in a position to further expand their already considerable personal empires. There is no direct analogy to a PSC member in our system. But to give readers an idea of the potential power one member of the PSC can accrue, lets look at the the formally “lowest-ranking” member of the PSC, Zhou Yongkang. The perpetually scowling Zhou is secretary of the CPC political and legislative committee, the body that handles public security and legal affairs (law enforcement, the legal system, internal security, and counter espionage etc.) In addition Zhou is well known to dominate the state’s lucrative monopoly on the oil. In essence this would be akin to one individual being Attorney General, director of the FBI, CIA, ATF and the CEO of Exxon Mobil. Unfortunately Zhou is not unique. Most high level CCP leaders or their families have utilized their connections to attain commanding positions in State Owned Enterprises (SOEs). SOEs are gargantuan and hugely-profitable. By some estimates they account for 80% of China’s GDP.

Compare that to the situation in the United States. I didn’t find either candidate very compelling. The campaign left a sour taste in a lot of people’s mouths but even a flawed choice is MUCH better than no choice at all! That voters ultimately decide, forces even the most powerful bodies to react to the feedback that elections provide. This has been in evidence during the last few days, as GOP leaders have been scrambling to figure out “what went wrong” and mulling efforts to make the party more appealing to a broader swathe of the electorate. I’m not trying to sound like a Polyanna here, but given the alternatives, Americans should be happy with what we have.

July 26, 2012
The increasingly strange case of Gu Kailai

(Bo and Co. in happier times)

The Bo Xilai saga took another bizarre turn yesterday when his wife, Gu Kailai was officially charged with the murder of British businessman Neil Heywood. From the Washington Post-

“The brief Xinhua dispatch said Gu and the aide, Zhang Xiaojun, were formally charged in a court in Hefei, in Anhui province, after prosecutors interrogated them and spoke to their defense team.

Xinhua, quoting unnamed investigators, alleged that Gu and Zhang poisoned Heywood after Gu and Heywood had a business conflict that also involved her son. The report said Gu believed Heywood was threatening her son.

The son is not named in the report but is believed to be Bo Guagua, a recent graduate of Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government, who is thought to be in the United States.

Xinhua said the court in Hefei “will hold a trial on a day to be decided.” Based on Chinese practice, it is likely to be soon. There was no explanation as to why Anhui province was selected for the prosecution, because the alleged crime took place in Chongqing. But politically sensitive cases are often moved to more distant locations.

“Worrying about Neil Heywood’s threat to her son’s personal security, Bogu Kailai along with Zhang Xiaojun, the other defendant, poisoned Neil Heywood to death,” Xinhua alleged.

“The facts of the two defendants’ crime are clear, and the evidence is irrefutable and substantial,” the Xinhua report said. “Therefore, the two defendants should be charged with intentional homicide.”

Since the beginning of the saga, official announcements have referred to Gu Kailai by the surname “Bogu,” combining Bo’s name with her maiden name, Gu. The practice is not common in China but is sometimes used by Chinese abroad.

There was no mention by Xinhua of the fate of Bo, who was considered a high-flier in the Communist Party hierarchy, destined for a promotion to the powerful Politburo Standing Committee, until his abrupt dismissal as Chongqing party boss in March.

Neither Bo nor his wife have been seen publicly in recent months. There had been no official statements on the case since an April 10 report announcing that Bo had been stripped of his remaining party positions as Gu and the aide were arrested on suspicion of murder.

China’s ruling Communist Party is preparing for a once-in-a-decade leadership transition this year. The Bo scandal has upended the carefully choreographed transition and exposed infighting and rifts within the party’s top ranks

Despite a wall of silence surrounding the case, senior Chinese officials speaking to diplomats, visiting academics and others have hinted that they wanted it settled before the opening this fall of the 18th Party Congress, which will select a new president and prime minister and fill seven vacant slots on the Politburo Standing Committee, which effectively runs the country.

Officials had previously suggested that Gu and the household servant would face severe judicial punishment in the Heywood killing. But there is uncertainty over how deeply Bo was involved or whether he would be punished by the courts or simply disciplined by the Communist Party……

Heywood was found dead in his Chongqing hotel room Nov. 15, and police initially said he died of heavy drinking.

The body was cremated before an autopsy was performed, but media reports have been filled with speculation that Wang may have kept some hair samples or other evidence in hopes of proving that Heywood was poisoned.” – Keith B. Richburg, Washington Post

PARSING THE STORY, WHAT DO WE MAKE OF THIS-

I keep coming back to the phrase “the evidence is irrefutable and substantial.” It seems unlikely that authorities would risk a case of this caliber without overwhelming evidence. With a leadership transition in the works and Bo already disgraced and out of power, authorities have little incentive to air this type of dirty laundry. It seems probable then that investigators do have considerable evidence and want to move as quickly as possible to get this out of the way before the party congress in October. Without a “smoking gun” leadership would probably have seen fit to let Gu live out her days quietly under house arrest. This would have avoided any negative press coming from a trial and allowed leadership to continue rebuilding the “united façade” that was shattered by the Bo Xilai imbroglio.

Reports say that Gu was concerned about the threat Heywood posed to her son Bo Guagua’s “personal security”.  This certainly opens up more questions than it resolves. Previously it was assumed an economic dispute was the motive for Heywood’s murder. What threat could Heywood have possibly posed considering he was in Chengdu, and Bo GuaGua was in Cambridge, Massachusetts studying at Harvard’s Kennedy School? Unless Heywood was some sort of James Bond-esque figure it seems highly unlikely that he could have threatened GuaGua’s physical security. Is it possible that Heywood had some particularly damning, undisclosed information about the young Bo? To venture in to the realm of rampant speculation could Heywood have possessed information that Bo Guagua was involved in criminal activity himself? Could Guagua have been acting as a “fence” for his family to smuggle money out of the PRC? Was he involved in academic misconduct or drug abuse that Heywood threatened to disclose to the media? It seems like murder would be a gratuitous reaction to a blackmail threat, but in China parents will go to great lengths to protect their children’s reputations. Still, this goes above and beyond. Hopefully some of these questions will be answered in Gu’s trial, but given the opaque nature of China’s judicial system, I highly doubt it.

June 25, 2012
http://www.theatlanticcities.com/commute/2012/06/whats-making-china-fat/2340/

Fact of the day: The number of obese people in China has quadrupled from 2005-2011. The group putting on the most pounds: young urban males. The obvious culprits for wider waistlines in Chinese cities are the proliferation of automobiles, fast food restaurants and desk jobs. A less noticed but perhaps equally relevant problem is that amid the recent construction boom many Chinese cities have become less walkable and less pedestrian friendly. As a result people are less inclined to walk and more inclined to drive or use public transportation. The Atlantic has a good piece exploring this problem

(Source: The Atlantic)

June 18, 2012
Black Swan Events: Expect the Unexpected

In financial terminology a “black swan event” is an event that is nearly impossible to predict. These events have a technically unpredictable effect on markets. Recent examples include the 9/11 terrorist attacks in America and the Fukushima crisis in Japan. While financial analysts may be able to accurately predict market drops precipitated by unemployment spikes or earnings shortfalls, a terrorist attack or an earthquake is much more difficult to account for. Obviously the “Black Swan” metaphor can and should be extended beyond the realm of financial markets. So called “Black Swan” events have far reaching political and social ramifications as well as economic ones.

Like other countries China has not been spared from random, unpredictable events. Take for example the SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) epidemic that swept through China and created a panic in early 2003. Then as now, the Chinese government was not trying to “rock the boat” while navigating a national leadership transition from Jiang Zemin to Hu Jintao. In early 2003 the SARS virus seemed to come out of nowhere. Despite initial symptoms quite similar to pneumonia, victims of SARS suffered a frighteningly high fatality rate of close to 11 percent. Unlike pneumonia, SARS claimed a number of young and middle-aged victims, who were in good health before contracting the virus. Despite the best efforts of Chinese authorities to mask the severity of the SARS crisis, news of the epidemic eventually escaped to the outside world sparking widespread panic. The effects of SARS on China’s economy were severe. Foreign corporations and governments quietly pulled their employees out of China. Tourism to China plummeted in the year following the SARS outbreak. One Chinese executive even said the international ostracism of China following SARS was “even worse than Tiananmen” (http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/04/11/1049567875256.html).

I am dredging up the SARS epidemic nearly ten years after it occurred because it is the perfect example of a “black swan” event. The SARS outbreak was entirely unanticipated by experts, but had a huge impact on China. SARS put a halt to a Chinese economy that had been enjoying an export driven boom since the Asian financial crises of 1997. Tourism to China and Hong Kong dropped off precipitously. The inability of China’s public health services to stem the epidemic and the government’s ham-handed attempts to conceal the magnitude of the crisis further undermined public trust in central authority. The lesson of SARS is that while it is impossible to predict the future, it is logical to assume unforeseen events with unexpected consequences.

June 13, 2012
Bad Foreigner/ Good Foreigner

Last month, in the aftermath of the Chen Guangcheng incident, Chinese authorities in Beijing announced a crackdown on illegal aliens living in Beijing. Official posters and propaganda called on citizens to “smash” the three illegals: “illegal immigration”, “illegal residence” and “illegal work”.  China like any nation has an obvious right to enforce its own immigration laws. That said this campaign comes off as a less than subtle attempt by officials to look tough on all things “foreign” in the wake of allowing Chen to exit China under the thinly veiled pretext of “studying abroad” in the U.S. While the official motives of the illegal-immigration crackdown are transparent, I still think the opinions of Chinese on foreigners and the behavior of foreigners within China is a topic well worth exploring. These two topics are inextricably linked since Chinese attitudes towards foreigners are not only influenced by things like foreign magazines and cinema, but also by the actions of the foreigners with which they encounter in their own communities and cities. It is the behavior of foreigners living in China and the reaction of Chinese to this behavior that I would like to focus on.

In my own personal experience the way that foreigners are greeted in China varies greatly, depending on whom they encounter. It is very rare that a foreigner, especially one of European descent is treated rudely. Nonetheless for myself there was a definite disconnect between the icy courtesy and cold stares of some and the almost fawning love of all things foreign that some young Chinese exhibit. There may be a happy medium, but it is certainly hard to find in China. Part of this is obviously generational. Younger Chinese stream NBA games on their I-Phones listen to Lady Gaga and munch on KFC, whereas the older generation can still vividly remember the lean years before the economic boom, when Mao denounced “American imperialism”.  Still the love-hate relationship with foreigners is more than just generational and is probably as old as Chinese civilization itself. As a foreigner it can be difficult to reconcile the borderline adoration one receives from some Chinese and the bitter indifference one meets from others. Partially as a result of this, some foreigners in China act quite unlike the way they would act in their home countries.

The last few months have seen some of both the worst and the best examples of foreigners in China. On a train ride in Northern China an arrogant Russian passenger, who happened to be a cellist for the Beijing orchestra put his feet above an old woman’s head. When she asked him to move his feet he mocked her and called her a “cunt” in fluent Mandarin. The uncouth cellist was rightfully, promptly fired by his employer, the Beijing Symphony Orchestra. This unfortunate incident came hot on the heels of a mentally deranged British tourist sexually assaulting a young Chinese woman in Beijing. When local pedestrians saw the depraved Briton assaulting the young women they descended on him and administered a hearty beating. Both of these incidents went viral on the Chinese blogosphere.

Examples of “good” laowai have also received a lot of buzz of late. Recently a Uruguayan tourist leapt into Hangzhou’s famed West Lake to prevent a Chinese woman from committing suicide. She saved the suicidal woman as several local onlookers stood passively by. The incident sparked not only praise for the American tourist, but also much handwringing among online pundits about the state of social responsibility and community in Chinese society. Many comments lamented the fact that foreigners with no stake in Chinese society could exhibit more empathy and compassion than Chinese. Earlier this year a video of a young American student chatting and sharing a bag of McDonalds French Fries with a homeless woman in Nanjing went viral. American Ambassador Gary Locke has also become something of a sensation in China. Online bloggers seem perpetually amazed by A) how little money he has in comparison to Chinese officials B) That American officials have to actually disclose how much money they have and C) by the casual, “do it yourself” way in which he behaves. He caused a stir before even arriving in China when he ordered his OWN coffee at the airport, while waiting for his economy class flight and wearing a backpack of all things! A Chinese Ambassador would be carrying Burberry, flying first class and would most certainly not be purchasing his own coffee. Why? There are lackeys for such things of course!

The biggest issue with these black and white portrayals of foreigners in the Chinese media is they do not really approach “lao wais” as individuals. The “bad lao wai” like the Russian cellist or the perverted Briton, strengthen stereotypes and deepen Chinese fears of exploitation and humiliation at the hands of foreigners, particularly sexual exploitation. Yang Rui the host of CCTV’s English language program dialogue gave voice to these fears when he posted the following on his micro blog-

“The Ministry of Public Security must clean out foreign garbage, arrest foreign thugs and protect ignorant/innocent girls, with Wudaokou (popular student area in Beijing) and Sanlitun (bar & restaurant district in Beijing] being the disaster areas [worst places]. Behead the snake heads [human traffickers], the unemployed Americans and Europeans who come to China to make money, trafficking in people, misleading the public and encouraging them to emigrate. Identify the foreign spies, who find a Chinese woman to cohabitate with, while their job is to collect intelligence, drawing maps and perfecting GPS [coordinates] for Japan, Korea, Europe, and America under the guise of being tourists. Drive out the foreign shrew, shut down Al Jazeera’s Beijing office, let those who demonize China shut their mouths!”

His asinine charges of Espionage aside, Yang seems particularly obsessed with the idea that Chinese women and foreign men are comingling. Undoubtedly there are some fairly pathetic old Western men who have fled to China to teach English because they have utterly failed professionally and socially in the West. It is certainly nauseating to see an old, wrinkled foreigner with an attractive young Chinese woman. But Yang conveniently forgets the fact that Chinese Women are adults capable of making their own decisions, no-matter how stupid they may seem. In addition, I’ve known many foreigners in China, and most of them couldn’t even find the right bus to get on let alone “set up” GPS coordinates. In light of this fact, Yang’s assertions are patently absurd. In actuality, Yang is projecting his own xenophobia and bitterness, which is ironic because he hosts a program with frequent foreign guests.

While the “bad laowai” reinforces Chinese phobias of exploitation at the hands of foreigners, the “good laowai” serves as a model for all that is lacking in modern Chinese society. For example where Chinese officials are venal and arrogant, Ambassador Locke is humble and transparent. The average Chinese citizen is “callous” and indifferent to his fellow man, whereas foreigners like the Uruguayan rescuer are empathetic and caring.

Neither the “bad laowai” nor “good laowai” stereotypes are particularly accurate. But they do save many Chinese from having to take a more nuanced view of foreigners as individuals capable of both good and bad actions, just like people pretty much everywhere.

April 12, 2012
"

The real-life murder mystery unfolding at the highest ranks of the Chinese government—featuring, so far, homicide, MI6, poison, Party infighting, and a police chief whose hobby involves organ transplantation—is not only a political opera that makes Berlusconi’s antics look like community theatre. It’s also the largest Communist Party convulsion since the arrival of the Web, and the juxtaposition between Party orthodoxy and today’s information culture has laid bare a fault line in the future of “enlightened authoritarianism.
.

Read more http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/evanosnos/2012/04/bo-xilai-and-his-wife-rumors-of-murder-in-china.html#ixzz1rpw3CGI4

"

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/evanosnos/2012/04/bo-xilai-and-his-wife-rumors-of-murder-in-china.html

March 15, 2012
A March Surprise

Breaking News- Bo Xilai, party secretary of Chongqing has been fired.  Chongqing is one of the largest cities in China and is sometimes referred to as “China’s Chicago”, for its booming industry and central location. This is unexpected.  Bo was a charismatic character and a rising star in the CCP. His firing signals a rejection of the Neo-Maoist ideology he vigorously promoted through the state media. Hopefully removing Bo and his protégés is an indication that the Chinese leadership is considering slow but incremental steps towards political reform.

February 27, 2012
http://www.slate.com/articles/business/ft/2012/02/ai_weiwei_discusses_his_art_his_politics_and_his_cats_.html

Good piece on Ai Wei Wei in the Financial Times. Despite being under extralegal house arrest he has maintained both his sense of dignity and humor. He also exhibits a remarkable willingness to speak honestly about his imprisonment and more generally the human rights situation in China, especially given the risks that defying a gag order on political speech carry.

February 2, 2012
NBA missing its shots in China

Good article in the New York Times on the NBA’s struggle to make inroads in China beyond merely marketing sneakers and drawing a large TV viewership.  The article focuses in part on former Denver Nuggets small forward, Wilson Chandler and his efforts to adjust to life in China.

During the NBA lockout many players were concerned about being out of work. Some players looked overseas for work opportunities. Unlike the European and Turkish leagues the CBA did not offer NBA players an opt-out clause if the labor-stoppage was resolved. Three former Nuggets players J.R. Smith, Kenyon Martin and Chandler signed deals with Chinese teams. Since arriving in China Smith and Martin have behaved petulantly and have done whatever possible to try to get out of their respective contracts. By contrast Chandler has embraced life in China, and is doing his best to make the most of this new experience. Despite the NBA season beginning anew he has stood by his choice ““I made a decision. You make a decision, you live with it.” I like Chandler’s attitude much better than his former teammates.

January 25, 2012
The Journey Home and Why it Matters.

The annual flood of migrant workers travelling home for the Spring Festival (lunar year) in China is the largest mass migration on the planet.

What drives these migrants? They wait in line for hours to buy tickets. They endure interminable delays. They stand on packed trains, sometimes for as long as 24 hours in a row. They endure all this to spend a few precious days with their families.  As the trains slide out of cities like Beijing, Chengdu, Shanghai and Shenzhen the migrant begins what is akin to a journey back in time.  The skyscrapers disappear from view, and another world emerges. At night the skies are pitch black and the stars are unrivaled in their intensity. As the sun rises, farmers emerge to work the fields. Out here, people’s ski n is leathery, grins are full of gaps, and hands are calloused from years of labor. These places are much as they have always been, with each sleepy little hamlet instinctively following the unceasing rhythm of the ages.  But even here there is change. A few farmers clutch chintzy cell phones, billboards alert motorists of upcoming gas stations and solar panels dot the roofs of some houses. And perhaps most of all, one notices a dearth of young people. Many have moved on to the cities.

2012 marks a milestone in Chinese history. For the first time, more Chinese will live in urban areas than in rural areas. Although the majority of Chinese now live in cities, China’s cultural values remain thoroughly grounded in its agrarian past. Chinese culture still strongly emphasizes loyalty to one’s family, deference to authority and respect for one’s elders. Although China’s brain and brawn may reside in the city, its soul remains firmly embedded in the countryside.

In many ways the journeys the migrants undertake each year are like pilgrimages, it is there chance to pay homage to family and tradition, and to reaffirm values that sometimes seem alien to materialistic, Western-influenced city dwellers. Still, one wonders if these age-old agrarian values will maintain their hold on society indefinitely. As more and more migrants have children in the cities, their links to the farms and villages of their ancestors will become more and more tenuous. But until then, the annual mass migrations home will continue.

January 18, 2012
Making Sense of the Pandemonium at Beijing’s Apple Store-

Angry mobs in central Beijing.  Brawls in the street.  Egg throwing.  Is it a revolution? Are China’s urban masses finally rising up and decrying their lack of political freedoms?  Are these enraged crowds driven by long simmering tensions over growing social and economic inequalities? Wrong on all counts.  No, the masses were gathering this Friday morning eagerly awaiting the release of Apple’s iphone 4S. The Western media has done a good job of covering the unrest, but has not fully elucidated why Apple products, especially smart phones and tablets are in such high demand in China. The primary reason for Apple’s popularity is that it’s seen as both a luxury item and a status symbol, but why?-

Scarcity- There are five Apple stores in China. All of the stores are located in Beijing and Shanghai, respectively. This makes Apple products less easy than other electronic products to acquire. It also makes them less common. The ultimate kiss of death for a luxury item in China is to be deemed “too common”. Witness the recent demise of Louis Vuitton (LV). For years an LV handbag or purse was the ultimate status symbol for young urban socialites in Beijing, Shanghai or Guangzhou. Because of LV’s status many young, middle class Chinese women would save for months just to be able to afford a single handbag (which can cost over a thousand dollars). I remember speaking with one 18 year old college student, who had literally saved up several years’ worth of allowance just to afford one bag. But in the long run the popularity of LV ended up cheapening the brand. Wealthy Chinese women did not want to be seen toting the same bags as secretaries and hostesses. The perception that LV was “too common” ultimately ended up favoring other luxury brands such as Hermes and Prada.

Difficult to Counterfeit- Apple is religious about protecting its technology. This combined with the distinct look of all its products makes Apple an extremely difficult brand to counterfeit. I have seen a few attempts at counterfeits of ipods but they were shoddy replicas, easily discernible from the original. In China counterfeits are ubiquitous. Since people are buying the brand and the status it confers, they want to be sure that they are buying the real thing. Unlike Nike, North Face or LV, it’s much more difficult to make a counterfeit iPad.

The future is now- Their sleek edges, touch screens, and shiny colors give Apple’s products a futuristic look. Certainly more so than their clunky Asian rivals such as Samsung and HTC.

Cost- iPhones and iMac’s prices put them way out of reach of even many middle class Chinese, increasing Apple’s scarcity, which in turn increases the brands status as “elite”. In China higher cost is almost always associated with better quality.

January 6, 2012

Former national security advisor to President Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski makes a compelling case against excessive nationalism in 21st century China- “a more assertive Chinese nationalism could arise and damage China’s international interests. A swaggering, nationalistic Beijing would unintentionally mobilize a powerful regional coalition against itself. None of China’s key neighbors — India, Japan, and Russia — is ready to acknowledge China’s entitlement to America’s place on the global totem pole. They might even seek support from a waning America to offset an overly assertive China. The resulting regional scramble could become intense, especially given the similar nationalistic tendencies among China’s neighbors. A phase of acute international tension in Asia could ensue. Asia of the 21st century could then begin to resemble Europe of the 20th century — violent and bloodthirsty. “

(Source: foreignpolicy.com)

January 4, 2012
Hu Can’t Have it Both Ways.

How ironic. The New York Times reports that Chinese President Hu Jintao is decrying the weakening of Chinese culture at the expense of Western influences. He says that China must “always sound the alarms and remain vigilant, and take forceful measures to be on guard and respond” to Western cultural infiltration. The article refers to oft-cited official laments that Chinese backed films often fare poorly against their Western counterparts. For example Avatar did remarkably well in China. An officially sanctioned biopic of Confucius, showing at the same time, did not fare nearly so well. But this is a faulty comparison. Of course a mega-blockbuster like Avatar is going to outshine a stale, state sponsored film, full of platitudes about filial piety and obedience. If the Chinese government would take its foot off the throat of its literati class, I have no doubt that its talented directors could produce films every bit as appealing to the Chinese public as Avatar.  But obviously cultural development and achievements are not the main priority of the authorities. The main priority is silencing any dissent. If that means snuffing out the voices of China’s most talented citizens, if it means censoring artists, poets, musicians, writers and directors, so be it. As a result Hu’s words do not signal any sort of shift to a new cultural openness or tolerance. If anything they merely signal a crackdown on Western influences. OK so maybe Lady Gaga’s CDs won’t be sold in stores and people will have to buy them on the street instead. Maybe CCTV will show a few less NBA games on TV. But for the most part Hu’s words are just that, empty rhetoric.

Perhaps if Mr. Hu had not done all within his power to stifle freedom of expression, Chinese culture would be in a more robust state to respond to Western challenges. Technocrats like Hu need to understand that art does not exist in a vacuum; it cannot be neatly isolated from society at large. Good art almost by definition pushes boundaries. China has some of the most talented, creative people in the world. The Communist party’s reactionary nature and intransigence aside, conditions in China are ripe for a cultural renaissance. There is great wealth in the cities and myriad potential patrons of the arts. Furthermore Chinese artists have a deep, millennia-old reservoir of culture and tradition to draw upon. If the authorities would only loosen things up, I believe we would see a cultural flowering in China the likes of which has not been witnessed for centuries.

(Source: The New York Times)

December 31, 2011
This week’s Economist cartoon totally hits the mark. Elections for central leadership positions such as President can be pesky “formalities” for non democratic states. Both Ahmadinejad and Putin have found this out the hard way. Hu Jintao and his anointed successor, Xi Jinping, are no doubt relieved that they still have the charade of the “Marxist-Leninist” system to shield them from indignities like having to stuff ballot boxes.

This week’s Economist cartoon totally hits the mark. Elections for central leadership positions such as President can be pesky “formalities” for non democratic states. Both Ahmadinejad and Putin have found this out the hard way. Hu Jintao and his anointed successor, Xi Jinping, are no doubt relieved that they still have the charade of the “Marxist-Leninist” system to shield them from indignities like having to stuff ballot boxes.

December 17, 2011

CNN story on Christian Bale’s attempt to visit Chen Guangcheng.

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »